And yet, it was them and not us, and this is their terrible journey to walk, and not ours.
I hope they have people who will sit with them and just let them hurt for a long time to come.
* * *
I've always felt handicapped by an ability to see both sides of an issue.
Other people always seem so sure of themselves. OF COURSE gun control is a good idea. Contrast the murder rate in the U.S. vs Canada! Why would anyone need guns, especially a cabinet full, and especially assault rifles? Seriously.
Or: Gun control is a TERRIBLE idea. If you're going to live in the country and deal with nutria and all kinds of other pests, you need a gun for economic reasons. And what about the cougar prowling around your friend's field, endangering all the kids in the neighborhood? And what about all the responsible, careful people who enjoy hunting and target shooting as a sport? Seriously.
On this issue and many others, few people seem to be somewhere in the middle, and ones I know and love are convinced they're utterly and completely right, and they're firm and solid in what they believe. Meanwhile, I understand both sides equally well so can't take a stand either way, which in some cases is a good way to go crazy.
[Or maybe those in the middle are just quieter.]
It's the same way with Christian/church/Biblical things. God's sovereignty vs. man's free will, for instance, also known as Calvinism vs. Arminianism. If you run in Christian circles, you've talked with people on each side of this who would die for their view and who have a neat and tidy explanation for all the verses that give some weight to the other.
Naturally, I can understand each side all too well, which always made me feel like an immature Christian who couldn't make up her mind.
We had a speaker at church recently (Ernest Witmer from California) who had a perspective I've never heard before. He said that we have very Western mindsets in that we are big on logic, a systematic progression of ideas, and tidy answers. If A=B and B=C, then A=C. That makes us happy. We are good at geometry.
The Hebrew mindset was different, he said. They were all about balancing and even embracing two opposing truths at the same time. The resulting tension was not something to be avoided--it was actually intentional.
So, he said, the seeming contradiction of so many truths in Scripture is intentional. God's judgment vs. his mercy and love. It's not either-or. They're both true. God's sovereignty and man's free will can both be true, however improbable, and we find meaning in striving for the balance between. We don't have to choose one or the other to be a mature Christian.
It's ok to believe that both can somehow be true, but not to understand quite how.
Parenting is all about that tension between love/acceptance/affection and discipline/toughness/boundaries. Church life--hugs and warmth and welcoming sinners while also challenging people to holiness and discipleship.
Finding a balance is never easy, but it helps if you think of the tension as having a purpose in and of itself.
I find it freeing.
* * *
The other day I overheard a woman say, " 'Sadie Gingerich'* is my favorite blogger!"
[*edited to add: I put Sadie G in quotes because she's a euphemism for a name I didn't want to state here, to protect everyone involved.]
And I felt an immediate stab of--yes--jealousy.
Thankfully I had the good sense to quickly take it to the Lord instead of mulling over it.
"Ok, God. I am jealous. What do I do with this?"
An immediate reply: "If you're No. 1, you have to maintain that position. Do you really want that pressure?"
[Sometimes the Holy Spirit sounds a lot like Paul.]
I thought: No. Shudder. I most certainly do not need or want that sort of pressure.
The Oregon Ducks are hovering toward the top of the rankings recently, which you already know if you follow football, and today they're number 2 in the CFP rankings, the newspaper says. There's an intense pressure at the top, it seems, and especially at No. 1. It's hard to maintain your footing there. Everyone is trying to take over your spot.
But even knowing that, it's hard to want someone else to do better than you.
Jealousy goes with the territory, author Deborah Raney said at a writers' conference I attended this year. You have to deal with it coming and going, both with your jealousy of others and others' jealousy of you.
I've certainly been on both sides of this.
Writers live and die by numbers. Book sales, blog hits, fan letters. But asking flat-out is like asking someone how much they weigh. So we listen hard and do math in our heads. "I lost 6000 readers a month when I had the baby and wasn't blogging much," a fellow blogger says, and you can just about hear the abacuses clicking in our heads as we wonder, well, was that 25% of her readers? And if so, she was getting, what, 800 hits a day?!! Unreal. Not fair. It's all because of those cute pictures of her kids.
And then you say that you decided to order 3000 copies of your new book, and non-writers say, "Hmmm. Cool," and other writers squint a bit and you can just about hear the whir and see the paper spooling out of the adding machine.
[If this is too honest for you, you can always go read Sadie Gingerich's blog.]
Deborah talked about being invited to a publisher's conference and having reason to believe that she was one of the featured authors. So she arrived, all excited and full of herself, and there were other authors' photos on the flyers, the billboards, and even on the sides of buses going around town. And not hers.
She was headed back to her hotel room to spend some time crying and feeling sorry for herself when she happened to be in the elevator with a ten-year-old boy. Who was blind. And who was so happy to learn how to push the right elevator button.
Deborah was thoroughly chastened.
But back to having favorites. I went off about this last night to one of my patient daughters. "Why do you have to announce who your favorite anything is?" I said. "In fact, why do you have to have a favorite at all? And shouldn't you have the decency to look around and see who might overhear--either in real life or online or anywhere else--before you just say it and hurt someone's feelings?"
The patient daughter disagreed. "No. That's being way too sensitive, and it's asking way too much of people. You seriously expect them to think, Ok, who else might see this and get jealous, before they say who they like best?"
Well, yes, maybe. At the very least when you're right there.
I can't tell you how many times people have come up to me at an authors' event and said, "Ooooh, you and Bob Welch are my two favorite columnists in the Guard, but I have to say I like Bob just a wee bit better."
And I think, "No. You do not have to say it, actually. I can live just fine not knowing that."
Then there were the times my fine husband was right beside another minister and someone came up to Paul and raved about his amazing sermons, implying if not actually saying that he was their favorite. And Paul thought, "No. Please. Don't do that."
I liked what Joanna Hendricks said in her book review this week, not only the nice words about Footprints but also the thoughts about having favorites.
So. It's ok if you like Bob Welch or Sadie Gingerich better than me, really. I like them better than me, too.
Just don't share that little piece of information with me--is that asking too much?
MP3 player and cords
African Pride Olive Miracle Anti-Breakage Maximum Strengthening Moisturizer Lotion
Lipton citrus green tea
--what Steven left in someone's car after a road trip